Or search by topic
This problem considers an alternative way in which understanding the evidence is important, here considering medical tests.
Alternatively, click below to read a description.
The ELISA (Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay) tests can be used to detect whether someone is HIV positive. These tests are cheap and easy to administer, but they are not always accurate.
In particular, for someone without HIV, there is a 1% chance that the test will record a positive result, called a false-positive.
Why is this not the same as saying "a positive result means there is a 99% chance of being infected"?
In low-risk groups, the rate of infection is approximately 1 in 10,000.
Virtually all people with HIV record a positive result: the probability of a false-negative result is negligible.
How could you use this new information to calculate the probabilty that someone who gets a positive result has HIV?
Are there any tables or diagrams that might help you represent the information?
Can you consider what you might expect to happen to 10,000 random people?
When you have thought about these questions, click below for some suggestions:
|Positive Test Result||Negative Test Result||Total|
|Person is HIV Positive|
|Person is HIV Negative|
Does this result surprise you?
Why is this test useful, despite the number of false-positives it produces?
A picture is made by joining five small quadrilaterals together to make a large quadrilateral. Is it possible to draw a similar picture if all the small quadrilaterals are cyclic?
It is impossible to trisect an angle using only ruler and compasses but it can be done using a carpenter's square.
Is there a relationship between the coordinates of the endpoints of a line and the number of grid squares it crosses?